[Translated] Teacher Chae Seong-ah teaches sex education( 채성아 선생님이 성교육을 해요)(Crayon shin-chan) [ENGLISH]

Who's the artist?

@Shadow (real) TL;DR please?

Why are Autists on every corner of the internet now? Nobody gives a fuck if you want to blacklist the artist or how shocked or offended you are, are the youth of today just as boring as parents in 80's/90's were or something?

It's so peak I always imagined this scene when i sometimes watch this Lol There should be more parts with lolis also btw so lewd n pretty teacher

Good stuff

Nigga stfu ts is absolute kino

-t I have covered most of the important topics, I shall leave some final remarks regarding this doujinshi, and a final overall rating. I hate this. I hate how it has some redeeming traits. This sucks. Fuck you. This is not atomic. 3/10.

-. Finally, I must review the story of this pornographic material. On the positive side, it does not seem too unrealistic or unbelievable. The story is essentially that of a pedophile impersonating the instructor of a kindergarten class, and predating on unknowing children. Although it may be a stretch, such occurrences are certainly a possibility. What is an impossibility is the fact that these children are capable of producing any semen in the first place. They should be nowhere near the stage of puberty in which such production even begins. I do suppose that such decision to give these characters the capability of ejaculation is essentially a requirement in order to make the story interesting, as "shooting blanks," as one may say, can be anti-climactic. However, a more realistic alternative would be to not involve males of that age to begin with. Besides all of that, I would say the story is average, resulting in a final rating of 2/10, as I am not a shotacon to begin with. Now tha-

-cantly. As a final notice regarding the art quality, I personally dislike large breasts. Overall, I shall repeat my previous claim in saying that the art is horrifyingly impressive, because the quality is high but the character choice and design is disgusting. Overall, I must rate the art quality as a 5/10. Next, I shall briefly cover the translation quality. This rendition of this doujinshi is evidently machine-translated, given a variety of factors including the font choice. I could be incorrect, but I do believe the translation has been done through Google. Objectively, it is a bad translation, yet still readable and understandable for the most part. I do understand the notion of having this doujinshi machine-translated however, as I do not believe any individual in their right mind would take their time to translate this work thoroughly and legitimately. The numerical rating of the translation shall arbitrarily be 3/10. This score may be affected for my distaste in borrowed power-

-What I can confirm is that the depiction of human semen is more or less realistic. The detail, coloring, and partial transparency is accurate to an extent that many of even the greatest artists cannot achieve. Praise aside, I will also cover the negatives pertaining to the art quality of this erotic work. First of all, WHY THE FUCK TO THE CHARACTERS LOOK LIKE THAT? WHY THE FUCK DOES SHE LOOK LIKE A HORSE? WHAT THE FUCK??? In other words, I find the female lead character to have an extremely unattractive, if not repulsive, face. Additionally, the various male characters are significantly less detailed (though I suppose I'd prefer that over having realistic children of their age), while maintaining the strange art direction in terms of facial structure. Somewhat off-topic to this section of the review, the decision to involve toddlers is repugnant to me. While I do personally enjoy my fair share of lolicon content, I do have a lower limit on age, and this exceeds that threshold signifi-

Hello all. For the 0 individuals who will witness this message, I present this brief review of this doujinshi (#576066). Before I dive into such topic, I would like to acknowledge my own bias in deciding which works to present a review on, oftentimes occurring in instances in which I am so pissed off I must simply submit a complaint. Additionally, I should clarify the fact that I have not viewed "Crayon Shin-Chan," nor been informed of its existence prior to witnessing this doujinshi. Therefore, there may be some additional context that I require, but do not have. Now, I shall move on to the review. To start, as is the usual case I shall begin with reviewing the art quality. To put it simply, it is horrifyingly impressive. Not only is it fairly detailed in the parts that matter, it is fully uncensored, and in full color. It also seems to be fairly anatomically correct, although I personally lack the experience in this subject matter in order to be able to ascertain this fact for sure.-

mfw there's no worthy tag to blacklist

Masterpiece in toddlercon OvO

At this point I am pissing at the grave of my childhood by looking at shit like this

@Ryu_k, I hadn’t seen crayon shin chan directly. I only learned about it through indirect exposure in parody and fanfic etc. I was probably around thirty before I even attempted to understand what it was 😅. For the record, I’m American and I don’t think it was available in my country until recently.

I guess most of the nhentai user are still a teen or some shit, they don't even know Crayon shin-chan lol

most nhentai users don't even know what crayon shin chan is

Artist isn't even tagged to blacklist....

alright enough internet for today....

censoring the face would make this better, it still not good, but better

With that face, hardly gets you turn on even with the lewd body

You know what readers want to read? That's right. It's Crayon Shin-chan doujin--- as if!

Is this legal?

My god wtf is this lol

what in the shin ?